We fabricate both, so we have no reason to talk you into either. Here is the honest comparison.
Most kitchens should use quartz. It costs less to fabricate, offers more edge options, and does everything a kitchen counter needs to do. Porcelain wins in specific situations — and when it wins, it wins clearly.
Side by side
| Choice Quartz | Choice Porcelain | |
|---|---|---|
| Thickness | 2cm | 12mm |
| Colours available | 102 | 46 |
| Hot pans directly on the surface | No — use a trivet | Yes |
| Scratch resistance | Very good | Excellent |
| Stain resistance | Excellent, non-porous | Excellent, non-porous |
| Sealing | Never | Never |
| UV / outdoor use | Indoors only | Suitable outdoors |
| Book-matched slabs | No | Yes, most patterns |
| Edge profile choice | Full range | Limited |
| Vertical / wall use | Heavy | Well suited |
| Fabrication cost | Lower | Higher |
The honest caveat about porcelain
It is harder than quartz, which is exactly why it resists heat and scratching — and exactly why it costs more to cut. The vulnerable moment is fabrication, particularly around sink cut-outs. Done properly it is superb. Done badly it chips.
That is an argument for choosing your fabricator carefully, not for avoiding the material. We cut both in-house.